CIVMS900820 - WILSON-V-WADE
EX PARTE HEARING RE: HARASSMENT
10/09/2009 - 8:29 AM DEPT. M3
DEBRA HARRIS PRESIDING.
CLERK: KIMBERLEY HATCH
COURT REPORTER GARY RAGLE GARY RAGLE
-
PLAINTIFF MADISON ROSE WILSON PRESENT
PLAINTIFF IS A MINOR - FATHER JONATHAN WILSON
PRESENT.
DEFENDANT KATIE WADE PRESENT
DEFENDANT IS A MINOR - MOTHER SHELLY WADE PRESENT.
-
PROCEEDINGS:
PREDISPOSITION HEARING HELD
ALL PARTIES ARE SWORN
DECLARATION REGARDING EXPARTE NOTICE FILED.
EX-PARTE HEARING IS HELD.
EX PARTE ORDERS DENIED.
NO EMERGENCY - SET FOR HEARING ONLY
-
HEARINGS:
OSC RE: HARASSMENT FILED BY MADISON ROSE WILSON IS SET FOR 10/28/09AT 09:00 IN DEPARTMENT M3.
ACTION - COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===
Civil Harassment .com
Stopping Abuse of Civil Harassment Restraining Order Law
Sidebar[Skip]
Defense against false Civil Harassment allegations
Notice of Non-Severability: this page is part of a whole work from which it may not be severed. Any construction of the meaning of any element on this page requires consideration of all other pages published as the whole work named www.civilharassment.com. Entire content of Legal Notice page and all other pages of www.civilharassment.com is expressly incorporated as part of this page.
Lobby to Reform
Public Policy
We are interested in your story and your restraining order and would be grateful to receive a copy of it (you may delete any personal references on the form). are compiling data to demonstrate that the Legislature's intent is not being followed by the trial courts. Examples include deletions from the restraining order forms approved by the California Judicial Council, such as the striking by the judge or commissioner of the mandatory firearms prohibition and the personal conduct and stay away orders, or the addition of "other orders" that limit your constitutional rights of free speech and petition or your real property rights.
Cameras and tripods are not weapons! — you lying idiots! — in Memoriam, Reuter's cameraman Namir Noor-Eldeen mistaken for man with a gun
Nothing contained herein is tendered as nor should it be considered as legal advice. What is legal is not necessarily justice. Almost all of reality is non-"published", ergo, what is legally affirmed is always a retarded misrepresentation of reality. Use at your own risk!