Bennett v. Sieverding - Neighborhood Code Dispute

Colorado case of property dispute with a town official writ large.

[ We have not fully researched whether the harassment statute used is strictly a "civil harassment".  However, the dynamics appear similar.]

From a comment at Volock Conspiracy

Kay Sieverding says:

I thought the idea is that prior restraint isn’t allowed unless it is related to a crime, such as yelling fire when there is none, or making bomb threats but that it is supposed to be easy to get an evidentiary hearing about false statements. In the context of a divorced couple I don’t know about statements related to sex and genitals and other really private stuff. Like Ty’s account, I passed out flyers complaining about development and zoning violations and for that and making oral accusations of constitutional violations I was criminally charged and basically put on house arrest until I sold my house below value to the lawyer of the city council president.
http://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/2000/sep/06/restraining_order_issued/
http://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/2001/jan/25/woman_in_harassment/  (


Sieverding v. U.S. Department of Justice Case No 10-5149

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

 

David Sieverding and Kay Sieverding

 

Appellants

 

v.

 

United States Department of Justice

 

Appellee

 

 

Case No 10-5149

 

Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil


Nothing contained herein is tendered as nor should it be considered as legal advice.  What is legal is not necessarily justice.  Almost all of reality is non-"published", ergo, what is legally affirmed is always a retarded misrepresentation of reality.   Use at your own risk!